chick logic
firstly, mr rick james no offence was taken (and i hope none was taken from you in my previous post as well). i'm quite liking this healthy debate we're having. it's providing that rare chance for both sides of the sexes to see the other side.
i would like to congratulate mr jashamn. in one sentence he has perhaps shown that it is he who has the most shrewd insight into the fickle game of dating, the opposite sex and romance. you are quite right jash, there is no exact rule to r/ships like there is to grammer. and i did not (as far as i can recollect) state that there was, unlike mr rick james. in providing my "womanly advice", any advice mind you, it is intended for the recipient to either take it on board of to reject the given advice. yet a "rule" implies that it must be followed.
but then conversely, the saying does go "rules are meant to be broken" .
secondly, it too is right when mr jashman states that "anecodtal evidence also supports vice-versa. not just from people you know, from everywhere." and whilst i am choosing to not accept your challenge of providing you with 10 instances of the phenomenon of the friend-to-lover occurring, mainly from the following reasons: 1. i'm not in the game of naming names 2. it is a breach of trust 3. some r/ships that have indeed started out this way has ended and as they are friends of mine and read this blog, i am sure they would not like to be mentioned just merely to prove a point. yet, mr jashman's point rings true. i may not provide you with the evidence that it has occurred but it is not to say that it hasn't.
Point 2: i am "suffering from chick logic" and if i had any sort of a conscience i should abstain from "dishing out 'womanly advice' that [i] very well know is verified [by] nothing but [my] uninformed opinons". has it occurred to you mr rick james, that you have also been doing the exact same thing as i am? your opinions on how to play the game can be construed as advice. it is your opinion seduction is a linear process, it is your opinion that the process follows your specified sequence, it is your opinion that following the process is the way to go to picking up a chick. by stating it, you have inadvertently provided advice to the male readers of our blog (despite you not labelling it "manly advice"). now i could refute you by stating that if indeed YOU had a conscience too you would'nt dish out advice that is verified by nothing but your uninformed opinion too but i won't. i recognise that it is your opinion and as the rule of opinions go, it is neither right or wrong. it's just simply the way you think, informed or uninformed.
MESSAGE TO GUYS.
read what you want out of my "womanly advice". i am not trying to mislead you guys into thinking that my way is the best way. not at all. just like poker, there's many ways to play the dating game. you just have to find out what does and doesn't work for you. in stating my "womanly advice" i am merely pointing out that there are other ways that r/ships can be fostered. how do i know? cos i've seen it happen. women are complex, fickle creatures. like snowflakes, no two are the same (geez look at us vikers as prime examples!), that's why one strategic plan of attack will not always work on the whole female population.
i would like to congratulate mr jashamn. in one sentence he has perhaps shown that it is he who has the most shrewd insight into the fickle game of dating, the opposite sex and romance. you are quite right jash, there is no exact rule to r/ships like there is to grammer. and i did not (as far as i can recollect) state that there was, unlike mr rick james. in providing my "womanly advice", any advice mind you, it is intended for the recipient to either take it on board of to reject the given advice. yet a "rule" implies that it must be followed.
but then conversely, the saying does go "rules are meant to be broken" .
secondly, it too is right when mr jashman states that "anecodtal evidence also supports vice-versa. not just from people you know, from everywhere." and whilst i am choosing to not accept your challenge of providing you with 10 instances of the phenomenon of the friend-to-lover occurring, mainly from the following reasons: 1. i'm not in the game of naming names 2. it is a breach of trust 3. some r/ships that have indeed started out this way has ended and as they are friends of mine and read this blog, i am sure they would not like to be mentioned just merely to prove a point. yet, mr jashman's point rings true. i may not provide you with the evidence that it has occurred but it is not to say that it hasn't.
Point 2: i am "suffering from chick logic" and if i had any sort of a conscience i should abstain from "dishing out 'womanly advice' that [i] very well know is verified [by] nothing but [my] uninformed opinons". has it occurred to you mr rick james, that you have also been doing the exact same thing as i am? your opinions on how to play the game can be construed as advice. it is your opinion seduction is a linear process, it is your opinion that the process follows your specified sequence, it is your opinion that following the process is the way to go to picking up a chick. by stating it, you have inadvertently provided advice to the male readers of our blog (despite you not labelling it "manly advice"). now i could refute you by stating that if indeed YOU had a conscience too you would'nt dish out advice that is verified by nothing but your uninformed opinion too but i won't. i recognise that it is your opinion and as the rule of opinions go, it is neither right or wrong. it's just simply the way you think, informed or uninformed.
MESSAGE TO GUYS.
read what you want out of my "womanly advice". i am not trying to mislead you guys into thinking that my way is the best way. not at all. just like poker, there's many ways to play the dating game. you just have to find out what does and doesn't work for you. in stating my "womanly advice" i am merely pointing out that there are other ways that r/ships can be fostered. how do i know? cos i've seen it happen. women are complex, fickle creatures. like snowflakes, no two are the same (geez look at us vikers as prime examples!), that's why one strategic plan of attack will not always work on the whole female population.
posted by viking_mistresses at 9:37 AM
3 Comments:
read this:
www.intellectualwhores.com
This is where the 'ladder theory' comes from.
“now i could refute you by stating that if indeed YOU had a conscience too you would'nt dish out advice that is verified by nothing but your uninformed opinion too but i won't.”
Don’t be passive aggressive – it’s unattractive. Like, very.
I’m not going to sit here and argue back and forth with you because at some level it’s titillating for you to feel ‘intellectual’.
I’ll state my case simply and disappear as quickly as I came in.
The challenge I’ve provided you with in my previous response is one that you cant surmount because, despite your transparent ramblings about preserving peoples’ feelings, you know as well as I do that you cant think of 10 instances within the last six months of the friend-to-lover phenomenon happening. Don’t argue for argument’s sake – just admit where you’ve been snookered and consider revising your beliefs about the world.
“it is your opinion seduction is a linear process, it is your opinion that the process follows your specified sequence, it is your opinion that following the process is the way to go to picking up a chick.”
It’s not my opinion. What I’ve described is the way it actually works. I’m telling you the sky is blue and you’re claiming ‘well that’s your opinion – it’s not always blue’. But it is 9 out of 10 times – and the majority of experience is what I’m trying to model. The difference between what I’m stating and what your chick logic is insisting on is that I’ve actually tried and tested what I advocate whereas you, quite obviously, have not.
And that is the fact of the matter: I’m making my assertions from the basis of experience and you’re motivated by your own desires about how things should be.
As Tony Robbins has famously said, “the best study of life is the way it is – not the way it should be.”
Good Luck & One Love,
The Ol’ Boy Rick James.
Post a Comment
<< Home