grovel pie
YES PEOPLE. WE'RE A CYNICAL BUNCH OVER HERE. GET USED TO IT.
now onto my latest rant. TRUST.
Webster's dictionary defines it as: "assured reliance on the character, ability, strength or truth of someone or something...a charge or duty imposed in faith or confidence or as a condition of some relationship"
Wikipedia defines it as: "the belief in the good character of one"
another cynical viker (ohhh guess which one!) said that to earn it you must proove that you are trustworthy in the first place. since when was it a sure thing that trust is automatically given between people? can you love someone and not trust them at the same time?
ahhh such a fickle world we live in. if only we were robots. it would make heartbreak easier to deal with.
now onto my latest rant. TRUST.
Webster's dictionary defines it as: "assured reliance on the character, ability, strength or truth of someone or something...a charge or duty imposed in faith or confidence or as a condition of some relationship"
Wikipedia defines it as: "the belief in the good character of one"
another cynical viker (ohhh guess which one!) said that to earn it you must proove that you are trustworthy in the first place. since when was it a sure thing that trust is automatically given between people? can you love someone and not trust them at the same time?
ahhh such a fickle world we live in. if only we were robots. it would make heartbreak easier to deal with.
posted by viking_mistresses at 10:24 PM
2 Comments:
Oh yes. The age old dilemma:
Innocent until proven guilty, or guilty until proven innocent?
neither. you're just ambivilant till the partner either does or does not proove him/herself trustworthy.
Post a Comment
<< Home